Robert Worth’s article, “Clash of the Patriarchs,” in the May 2024 issue of The Atlantic offers a compelling narrative about the fissures within Orthodox Christianity.
Worth traveled to New York City for a lengthy interview with Archbishop Elpidophoros of America that adds a unique layer to the story, revealing contrasts between the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew’s forward-thinking stance and the Russian Orthodox Church’s alignment with political power. Bartholomew’s commitment to modernizing the Church and advocating for environmental stewardship is prominently featured, positioning him as a reformative leader determined to align the Church with contemporary global concerns.
Against this backdrop of progress and openness, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow is depicted as a figure whose actions are intertwined with the political machinations of Putin’s Russia. The stark difference between Bartholomew’s aspirations for the Church and Kirill’s subservience to state agendas illustrates the ongoing struggle within Orthodox Christianity. Bartholomew’s approach is not just about modern relevance but also about a moral imperative to embrace scientific understanding and protect creation, marking a definitive step towards a more enlightened and globally conscious Orthodoxy.
The article delves into the tension between Bartholomew’s drive for autonomy and independence for national churches, such as the one in Ukraine, and Kirill’s efforts to exert influence, often through methods that border on coercion, backed by Russian state power. The contrast in their leadership is not just theological but echoes in the political realms, with Bartholomew championing self-determination and Kirill reinforcing Putin’s vision of a “Russian world.” This dichotomy underscores the broader ideological battle for the soul of the faith, extending far beyond the ecclesiastical realm.
In conclusion, Worth’s piece paints Bartholomew as a visionary leader, determined to guide the Church through challenging times. Bartholomew’s forward-looking leadership, with its emphasis on embracing science and promoting environmental responsibility, offers a counterpoint to the regressive stance of Kirill, who appears more as a relic of the past, unable to break free from the shackles of a political dictatorship. Through interviews and vivid anecdotes, Worth captures the essence of a Church at a crossroads, with its future shaped by leaders who either resist or embrace change.
