In the field of theological science, certain foundational assumptions guide us so that we do not forget what we have learned. Among these, the most important and undoubtedly the most influential Greek theologian of our time—and one of Orthodoxy’s foremost figures—was the late Metropolitan John (Zizioulas) of Pergamon. Notably, he was the first clergyman to serve as president of the Academy of Athens.
Even those who disliked him—many, due to his strong character and absolute positions—recognized his impact. He passed away two years ago.
He studied Theology at the Universities of Athens and Harvard and taught at the Universities of Edinburgh, Glasgow, London (King’s College), and the Theological School of the University of Thessaloniki.
A professor and hierarch, he became a landmark figure in world theology —truly unsurpassed.
Looking more closely, I could not find when Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew officially honored him for his theological contributions —contributions respected by all modern theologians, both Orthodox and Catholic alike.
Contrasts
I highlight this solely for contrast —and because it has been a topic of quiet discussion within the patriarchal court, where few dare to speak against those favored by the leadership.
At the age of 85, the Ecumenical Patriarch traveled to England to honor Aetios, the director of his Patriarchal Office.
Why? Because Aetios was awarded a Doctor of Laws degree from Cardiff University, specializing in Ecclesiastical Law. That’s commendable. He is young and has a promising future ahead.
However, this “achievement” is one shared by hundreds of others within the ranks of the Patriarch, Metropolitans, and clergy of the Ecumenical Throne.
Yet, for none of them has the Ecumenical Patriarchate issued a formal statement emphasizing that they passed “with excellent marks and without any corrections” (!).
Incidentally, British universities rarely declare a doctorate passed without corrections. In the case of this Great Ecclesiarch, no mention was made of who evaluated his thesis Let’s be frank. It would be interesting.
Beyond the announcement, the Patriarch personally traveled to honor him.
Of course, we anticipate the usual explanation from Phanar: the Patriarch was in Britain to inaugurate a church and “at the margins of the visit” honored the Great Ecclesiarch Aetios by his presence.
With all due respect, I would like to suggest to those who coordinate the Ecumenical Patriarch’s schedule some more meaningful destinations for his future travels —while his health still allows.
He could visit Alexandria to consult with Patriarch Theodore on preventing the Russification of Africa.
He should be in Jerusalem to call Theophilos to order, or in Egypt to support the internationalization of the issue and the Sinai Monastery’s quest to regain legal independence.
These are the true reasons why a church leader can distinguish himself.
In the realm of Orthodox theology, Metropolitan John Zizioulas was unparalleled. The next figure to rise to such stature may emerge too late.
Melchizedek
*Republished from the newspaper “Orthodox Truth”
